• Users Online: 292
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
REVIEW
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 15  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 70-74

A review of scleral flap shape on trabeculectomy outcomes


1 Yale Scool of Medicine, New Heaven, CT, USA
2 Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Plamer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA

Correspondence Address:
MD, PhD Arindel S R. Maharaj
7101 Fairway Drive, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33418
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

Introduction: Trabeculectomies are amongst the most common surgical procedures to lower intraocular pressure (IOP). Scleral flap dimensions are a key factor in influencing aqueous outflow and subsequent IOP reduction, especially in the early postoperative period. Despite the substantial diversity of scleral flap shapes that is used in practice, there is little information comparing outcomes between them. In this study, we review the literature on the uses and outcomes of various scleral flap shapes. Methods: A literature review was performed using the databases: MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science. Search terms for relevant studies included the following: trabeculectomy AND (square OR triang* OR rectang* OR polygon* OR arc OR shape) AND flap. Results: Our initial literature search revealed 71 unique articles, six of which met our inclusion and exclusion criteria and were reviewed. Four articles reported the use of triangular flaps, one rectangular flap, one square flap, and two arc-shaped flaps. The data from each article were reviewed for the following:
  1. Surgical technique;
  2. Early postoperative intraocular pressure reduction;
  3. Final postoperative intraocular pressure reduction;
  4. Postoperative complications.
Conclusions: A myriad of scleral flap shapes is utilized in surgical practice. Essentially all of the trabeculectomy procedures, regardless of scleral flap shape, achieved substantial reductions in IOP with similar success rates. However, due to the variability in surgical technique and lack of direct comparison, we cannot definitively conclude or deny that one flap shape is superior to another. We believe our review provides the most comprehensive analysis of scleral flap shape to date and highlights its importance in regulating aqueous flow, especially in the early postoperative period.


[PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed354    
    Printed12    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded45    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal