• Users Online: 191
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
CASE REPORT
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 15  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 61-62

Bilateral ring-shaped corneal opacity: case report and review of the literature


1 Ophthalmology Department of Centro Hospitalar de Entre o Douro e Vouga; Ophthalmologist, Department of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar de Entre o Douro e Vouga, Santa Maria da Feira, Portugal
2 Ophthalmology Department of Centro Hospitalar de Entre o Douro e Vouga; Resident in Ophthalmology, Department of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar de Entre o Douro e Vouga, Santa Maria da Feira, Portugal

Correspondence Address:
MD Raquel Almeida
Rua Dr. Cândido de Pinho, 4520-211 - Santa Maria da Feira
Portugal
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

Purpose: To describe a rare bilateral corneal ring-shaped opacity, not categorized as corneal dystrophy or degeneration occurring without any associated ocular or systemic disease. Methods: Case report and review of the literature. Results: The authors describe the clinical history and examination of an 80 years old man, with an asymptomatic bilateral and symmetrical ring-shaped corneal opacity in the deep stroma of the corneal mid-periphery. The surrounding corneal stroma was clear, and the tear film, epithelium and its basement membrane, Descemet’s membrane and endothelium were normal. This rare corneal anomaly was discovered by chance and its etiology is unknown. Conclusions: These rings may result from deposits of unknown origin or possibly a rare corneal dystrophy.


[PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed268    
    Printed16    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded44    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal